Personal statement examples for 2027 entry: one full statement, with notes on every answer

By Sophie Chen · Updated 2 October 2026

Before you read any personal statement example, this one included, know where it ends up. UCAS checks every statement against previous ones and against "a library of sample statements collected from websites". Anything over 30% similar goes to its Verification Team. The findings go to you and to every university you applied to (UCAS, "Similarity guidance for applicants", checked 1 October 2026). So an example is for seeing what a good answer chooses to talk about and how much it proves. Borrow those choices if you like. Don't borrow a sentence.

Below is one complete statement, all three answers for one made-up History applicant, with notes on every part of it, including the line I'd cut. I wrote it. It isn't a real applicant's. And it's on a public website, so it's exactly the kind of text that library collects. After it there are three bad-and-better pairs, one per question, and two single answers for Chemistry and Nursing.

The calendar first. It's tighter than it looks. For 2027 entry, Oxford, Cambridge and most medicine, dentistry and vet courses close at 18:00 on Thursday 15 October 2026, and most other courses at 18:00 on Wednesday 13 January 2027 (UCAS, "Dates and deadlines for uni applications"). That's 14 days on from this update (1 October) for the October group. Your school's internal date sits before that, because a teacher has to write and attach your reference before the application can go. Medicine, dentistry and vet applicants should also check which choices want an admissions test. If you've got nothing on paper yet, I'm not going to tell you there's plenty of time. Get a true version written this weekend and polish it next week.

The three questions, word for word

There's no blank box any more. Since 2026 entry you answer three questions, in UCAS's exact wording:

1. Why do you want to study this course or subject?
2. How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare for this course or subject?
3. What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Each answer needs at least 350 characters. The three share 4,000 characters between them, spaces included, and you decide the split (UCAS, "How to write your personal statement: 2026 entry onwards"). UCAS also says your answers "will be reviewed as one". That's why the example below is one applicant all the way through, not three strangers.

A full example: History, all three answers

The applicant is in Year 13, taking History, English Literature and Politics, and applying for History at five universities. Character counts include spaces, as UCAS counts them. The whole statement is 3,746 characters.

Question 1 (1,565 characters)

I got interested in how history is argued over when our class compared two accounts of Peterloo: Samuel Bamford's memoir, written by a man who marched to St Peter's Field, and the letters the Manchester magistrates sent to the Home Office. They describe the same afternoon and barely agree on who started the violence. Since then I've read E. P. Thompson on the radical movement in The Making of the English Working Class, and I've found I'm less interested in who was right than in why the government backed the magistrates' version so quickly. Over the summer I read Robert Poole's Peterloo: The English Uprising, and I spent longer on the footnotes than on the chapters, because I wanted to see where each version of that afternoon had come from. Many of them were sworn accounts from the trials and inquests that followed, like Henry Hunt's trial at York in March 1820: people giving evidence months later, in a courtroom, with something to lose. That changed how I read the magistrates' letters too. They were already making a case for what the magistrates had done. I don't think the magistrates were simply lying, though. Some of them seem to have believed a crowd that size was an uprising, and I'd like to understand how that fear worked. The question I keep coming back to, whose account gets believed by the people in charge and why, isn't only about 1819. I want a degree where I can follow it into other protests and how they were reported and policed, from the Chartists to the miners' strike, and learn to read the paperwork the way a historian does.

What it's doing. It opens on two named sources and the point they disagree on. So the applicant is already doing the basic move of the degree (reading two accounts against each other) before anyone has asked. Thompson comes in as the reading that followed the lesson. Poole is there for a different reason. The applicant says what they did with the book, which was read the footnotes, and that's much harder to fake than "I read widely". The question near the end ("whose account gets believed by the people in charge and why") is one a tutor can pick up at interview and push on (our interview guide covers what gets asked). The last sentence names other episodes (the Chartists, the miners' strike) and no university or module, so it reads the same to all five choices.

Question 2 (1,319 characters)

In Year 12 I wrote an essay on the Chartist petition of 1848, which the Chartists said had nearly six million signatures. When Commons clerks counted, they found fewer than two million, and names like "Victoria Rex" and "Punch". I had to decide how much that mattered. My teacher's comment was that I'd treated the clerks' count as a plain fact in one paragraph and as government propaganda in the next, and she was right. I rewrote it so it argued one thing: that the count tells us a lot about what Parliament wanted to believe and much less about how many people supported the Charter. I've tried to argue one thing at a time in my A-level coursework too, a hundred-year question that starts at Peterloo, and I now log where every quotation came from, after a wasted afternoon hunting for a page number I'd lost. English Literature has helped in a different way. Studying Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton, set in Manchester at the time of the Chartists, I had to treat a novel as evidence of what a middle-class writer believed the working poor were like, and although Gaskell is sympathetic where the magistrates were afraid, she's still describing the poor from outside, which is the same problem with the evidence. Politics has given me the language of rights and representation that the Chartists were arguing in.

What it's doing. The Year 12 essay gets one concrete fact (the 1848 petition, the count, "Victoria Rex") and then the applicant's own decision about it. The teacher's comment is the best line in the whole statement. It admits a mistake and says what changed, and that tells a tutor more about how this person will take feedback in a seminar than any claim about "analytical skills". UCAS's own guidance says question 2 is where you "shout about the relevant or transferable skills" from your formal education. The two subjects that aren't History get one job each: Mary Barton as a second kind of evidence, Politics for vocabulary. Predicted grades are left out, since they're already elsewhere on the form.

Question 3 (862 characters)

Outside school I've worked Saturdays at a garden centre since Year 11, and since January I've volunteered one evening a week with our local history society, typing up handwritten minute books from a Co-operative Society branch in the 1920s so they can be searched. It's slow, and most of it is about the price of coal and who missed a meeting. But it's shown me how much an archive depends on what somebody decided was worth writing down. In March I found a two-line entry about members voting to stop buying from a shop during the 1926 General Strike, which nobody in the society had known about, and I wrote a short piece on it for their newsletter. Two members told me afterwards that their grandparents had shopped at that branch, and one brought in a photograph of it. Working at the garden centre has taught me the importance of teamwork and communication.

What it's doing, and the line I'd cut. The minute books do the work. The applicant admits they're dull (coal prices, missed meetings), and then one two-line entry turns into a piece of writing someone else published. That's unpaid research outside school, which is what question 3 is for. The weakest sentence is the last one, about the garden centre. It claims two qualities and shows neither, and you could paste it into almost any statement ever written. I left it in so you can see how flat it reads next to the minute books. In a real draft I'd either give the garden centre one specific moment or cut the sentence and hand its 88 characters back to question 1.

The split here is about 42% / 35% / 23%. That split is my judgement, and UCAS leaves it to you. For an academic subject I'd put the most weight on question 1. For nursing, medicine, social work or teaching I'd flip it and give question 3 the most room, since most of the evidence for those courses comes from work and placements.

Bad and better, one pair per question

All three bad versions below are under UCAS's 350-character minimum as well, which is the least of their problems.

Question 1, the childhood opener. This is the version people write after being told to "show passion".

History has always fascinated me because it helps us to understand the present. Ever since I was young I have been passionate about learning about the past, and studying the Peterloo Massacre at A-level deepened my love of the subject even further.

"Fascinated", "passionate" and "love" are three ways of claiming an interest without showing one. Swap "History" for "Geography" and the Peterloo sentence for one about coastal erosion, and it reads just as well for a geography applicant. The question 1 above never uses any of those three words.

Question 2, the qualifications recital.

I am currently studying A-levels in History, English Literature and Politics. These subjects have given me strong analytical and essay-writing skills, which I believe will help me to succeed at university.

Everything in it is already on the form (your subjects are listed in the qualifications section). And "strong analytical skills" is the very claim the tutor is reading to test. The fix is one piece of work and one thing you did differently because of it, like the 1848 petition essay above.

Question 3, the activity list.

I have completed my Bronze Duke of Edinburgh Award, I am a member of the school debating club and I have a part-time job. These activities have taught me time management, teamwork and leadership.

It lists three activities and three qualities and never says why any of them matter, which is half of what question 3 asks. UCAS's similarity software ignores "a selection of commonly used words and phrases such as 'Duke of Edinburgh' and 'football'", because so many statements contain them. If you keep one activity, say what you did in it and what it's got to do with the course. A short honest paragraph about captaining a netball team, and what organising people who don't want to be organised taught you, is fine at 400 characters or so.

Two more single answers, for science and for nursing

If History is a long way from your subject, these two show the same moves somewhere else. Both are constructed too.

Chemistry, question 2 (603 characters).

A-level Chemistry taught me to distrust a result that looks too tidy. In my first titration practical my three titres agreed to within 0.05 cm³, and I was pleased until my teacher asked how I'd prepared the pipette. I'd been rinsing it with distilled water before each run and not with the alkali, so every 25.0 cm³ sample was slightly diluted and every titre came out too small by about the same amount. The results agreed with each other and were all wrong. Now I check how equipment was prepared before I trust a number from it, and I write the preparation down in my lab book alongside the readings.

It's the same move as the History essay, a mistake and then the habit that came out of it. Explaining why three matching readings were still wrong shows the applicant knows the difference between precise and accurate.

Nursing, question 3 (610 characters), from a gap-year applicant.

Since leaving sixth form this summer I've worked full time as a care assistant at a residential home in Stockport. The part of the job I've learned most from is the 2pm handover, when the morning staff pass on who has eaten, who is unsettled and who needs watching. I've learned to write those notes so that someone who has never met the resident could act on them. Twice in my first month I went and found the senior carer instead of guessing. A resident who always finishes her lunch had left all of it, and a man's ankle looked more swollen than it had at breakfast. Both times the senior carer rang the GP.

The handover has a time on it, and each of the two occasions names the thing noticed (a full plate, a swollen ankle), so "observant" is shown rather than claimed. "Went and found the senior carer instead of guessing" is the judgement call that matters, and it's the right one for someone a month into care work. UCAS lists "Work experience, employment, or volunteering" first among the things question 3 is for.

One set of answers, five choices

All five choices read the same three answers. Don't name a university. Don't build an answer around one course's module list either. If your five are a mix (say Mechanical Engineering at three and Aerospace at two), write about the maths and physics they share and keep aircraft to a sentence. Medicine, dentistry and vet applicants can apply to "a maximum of four courses" in their subject (UCAS, "Filling in your UCAS application"). So a fifth choice has to be something else, reading the same statement.

The mixed case is the one people ask about. On Sunday 20 September a Year 13 student posted in The Student Room's personal statement forum, in a thread called "Liberal Arts Personal Statement (KCL or otherwise)", that they were applying for Classics everywhere except King's. At King's they wanted Liberal Arts. Their statement was "incredibly classics/philosophy heavy". They asked, "would this disadvantage me in the admissions process?" 04MR17, one of the forum's volunteer applications advisers, answered the next morning. "No, if you would be taking a classics focus within your Liberal arts course then you write about classics in your personal statement." Then, just after midnight on 27 September, the student came back with the question I'd have asked too. "Would admissions officers not wonder why I didn't apply for the Classics course instead?"

Some might. I'd write the classics statement and add one sentence in question 1 on what you'd want from studying it alongside other subjects.

Drafting it, and where ChatGPT fits

Draft somewhere that saves (Google Docs, Word, the Notes app, anything but a form you haven't pressed save on). Get to about 4,500 characters before you start cutting, because cutting a long draft down is easier than padding a short one. Two readers is plenty. One should be a subject teacher, to check the examples hold up. The other should know nothing about the subject. They'll tell you where they got lost.

When you submit, you declare that your statement "hasn't been copied or provided from another source, including artificial intelligence software". UCAS says that generating all or a large part of it with a tool like ChatGPT "could be considered cheating by universities and colleges". It does allow some uses. Brainstorming, structure and readability feedback are all on its list (UCAS, "A guide to using AI and ChatGPT with your personal statement", checked 1 October 2026).

I'd be stricter about readability. A readability check slides very easily into asking for the draft to be "improved". What comes back tends to swap your odd, specific words for smoother, emptier ones. Run the Chartist answer through and you'd probably get back that the applicant "developed a keen eye for the reliability of historical sources".

The fear now runs the other way too. On Monday 21 September a Cambridge applicant posted on The Student Room, in a thread titled "Grammarly thinks my personal statement was written by AI!!! Help!", that a checker had flagged most of their own statement ("It's like 90% of it!!"), a week before their school's internal deadline. Three days later they came back to say that they and their teachers had worked out "it was because I was expressing concepts in an unnecessarily complex way". They'd simplified it. On 26 September 04MR17 replied. "Please ignore all this 'sounds like AI' nonsense from checkers." Then, "Best thing to do for flow and tone of a PS is to read it out loud."

Editorial standards

Written by

Sophie Chen

UCAS, personal statements, admissions tests, results day and Clearing are Sophie Chen's. She wrote her first guide for the site in August 2025 and doesn't do pep talks. sophie@unisorted.co.uk